Hey Nadz,
There's often more to it than just rubber stamping rule submissions. I don't think CAMS will knock it back anyway, from what I've seen and been involved with the proposed rules will clear up a lot of grey areas. CAMS need to consider a lot of things, costs, potential liability, spirit of competition/category, safety standards etc. This takes time because even though people think CAMS is this giant monolith with 400 employees, this is far from the truth. The confederation relies a lot on volunteers on panels and commissions to give up their time to do a lot of the hard yards.
Like everything, there is a process involved, otherwise you end up with a free-for-all where every category keeps asking for more and more freedoms, going faster and faster and spending more money to do so. Eg. Improved Production is so far removed from what was originally envisaged when the Club Cars category was started up in the late 80's early 90's, they've had so many freedoms allowed over the years that a few of the front runners need V8SC running gear to stay competitive. Sets of tyres for those blokes almost cost as much or more than a set of Dunlops the Sports Sedans run! Saloon Cars is another one, their category "management" have allowed more and more freedoms in certain areas that they aren't even close to what was envisaged as a basic Holden Commodore v Ford Falcon series. Even the QLD Gemini Series runs fibreglass guards, non-points ignitions, Yoko A050's that cost a bomb, beefed up drive trains etc. Try and buy a decent Formula Vee for less than $60K also - this is another ridiculous scenario - entry level openwheelers....
Part of the problem is various categories want this, want that, but somewhere the line needs to be drawn. Unless people just want to race in butchers picnic events where all-in, no rules, do whatever you like. I know I don't, and would much prefer to be involved in properly regulated categories and events.
Good question though mate.
